NO ANIMALS WERE HARMED IN THE MAKING OF THIS VIDEO (they were already dead, not by my hand. Read Below.)
You hear about the lawsuit where a person may have found a rat in their dew?
Decided to test if soda will dissolve a rat. Having seen it before on youtube at about 40 days, so this experiment expanded it to be 1 year.
Video referenced can be view at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U8f8...
MORE DETAILS: This video was removed due to lack of information. After appeal, it is back! But as promised to YT, here is the built out details. There is a point in the video starting at 2:58 where the details are outlined in text, but also only in brief. This is a slight expansion on those details:
No animals were harmed with the sole intent of this video! The rodents are pre-killed elsewhere (in a manner generally considered humane) as feed for reptiles. The rats were not wasted solely for this video. They were feed for young snakes. In the morning the rats that are not eaten are most often disposed of, as they cannot be fed to the other snakes at that point. Rather than simply dispose of the rats, they were reused and given a new purpose: this experiment.
The death of the rats was not malicious, nor for any intent other than what's natural, feeding a predator who would die without it. No intent of animal abuse.
The video is a response to the linked video in which a mouse went through a similar experiment. After learning of the Pepsi lawsuit via a coworker, I found that video and something didn't sit right. The size of the animal used (too big to fit in a soda container), the container, and the final results. Aside from testing the claims originating from the Lawsuit, this was also to test the results of other person's experiment using different methods. With a rat that would be the right size (to enter a bottle) readily available from feeding snakes, there was a chance test and experiment without wasting an animals life solely for an experiment (have I stressed yet that the animal was not wasted for the experiment, but rather given a new use instead of simply being disposed of, which would be wasteful?). The end result shows insight to why the case of a rat being found in mountain dew was properly ruled upon. It also reveals some inconsistency in results of the other youtuber's video. As an unintentional benefit, it also exposes the dangers of sodas when it comes to bones, hopefully allowing some to consider healthier life choices and drink less soda.
The end result is not pretty, but also not gore-ish, violent, nor vulgar. Although in ways grotesque, the intention was not to purposefully nor solely repulse, offend, infuriate, upset, or sicken.
(For those saying these are mice, they are not. These are rats. Those who wondered if this changes anything: it very well could. The bones, cartilage, and other parts of the skeletal system would be potentially more formed and harder/denser in a mouse of the same size due to age as the mouse would be older, the rat still very young.)
You hear about the lawsuit where a person may have found a rat in their dew?
Decided to test if soda will dissolve a rat. Having seen it before on youtube at about 40 days, so this experiment expanded it to be 1 year.
Video referenced can be view at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U8f8...
MORE DETAILS: This video was removed due to lack of information. After appeal, it is back! But as promised to YT, here is the built out details. There is a point in the video starting at 2:58 where the details are outlined in text, but also only in brief. This is a slight expansion on those details:
No animals were harmed with the sole intent of this video! The rodents are pre-killed elsewhere (in a manner generally considered humane) as feed for reptiles. The rats were not wasted solely for this video. They were feed for young snakes. In the morning the rats that are not eaten are most often disposed of, as they cannot be fed to the other snakes at that point. Rather than simply dispose of the rats, they were reused and given a new purpose: this experiment.
The death of the rats was not malicious, nor for any intent other than what's natural, feeding a predator who would die without it. No intent of animal abuse.
The video is a response to the linked video in which a mouse went through a similar experiment. After learning of the Pepsi lawsuit via a coworker, I found that video and something didn't sit right. The size of the animal used (too big to fit in a soda container), the container, and the final results. Aside from testing the claims originating from the Lawsuit, this was also to test the results of other person's experiment using different methods. With a rat that would be the right size (to enter a bottle) readily available from feeding snakes, there was a chance test and experiment without wasting an animals life solely for an experiment (have I stressed yet that the animal was not wasted for the experiment, but rather given a new use instead of simply being disposed of, which would be wasteful?). The end result shows insight to why the case of a rat being found in mountain dew was properly ruled upon. It also reveals some inconsistency in results of the other youtuber's video. As an unintentional benefit, it also exposes the dangers of sodas when it comes to bones, hopefully allowing some to consider healthier life choices and drink less soda.
The end result is not pretty, but also not gore-ish, violent, nor vulgar. Although in ways grotesque, the intention was not to purposefully nor solely repulse, offend, infuriate, upset, or sicken.
(For those saying these are mice, they are not. These are rats. Those who wondered if this changes anything: it very well could. The bones, cartilage, and other parts of the skeletal system would be potentially more formed and harder/denser in a mouse of the same size due to age as the mouse would be older, the rat still very young.)
Rats After 1 Year In Soda, what will happen? (Read Description!!) camera iphone 8 plus apk | |
17,659 Likes | 17,659 Dislikes |
2,401,219 views views | 11 followers |
People & Blogs | Upload TimePublished on 8 Dec 2015 |
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét